Europeans face down air tax for development funds suggestion
by Brian Turner
An idea to charge air passengers a tax as a way of raising money for European development has caused a rift between finance ministers of the European Union’s members.
First proposed in January at the World Economic Forum by the French, as an aviation tax of $1 per ticket, such a tax could potentially raise $10 billion (€7.9 billion, £5.4 billion) per year to fund development projects.
A discussion paper before this past weekend’s meeting of EU finance ministers had suggested a tax of €10 per ticket on flights within the EU and €30 per ticket on flights to non-EU destinations.
Only France and Belgium said they were prepared to commit to a mandatory airline tax, however. Other nations, mostly those with large tourist industries, were generally opposed to the idea.
The Austrian finance minister, for example, said that he could not support such a proposal because it would hurt consumers and distort competition.
Several officials said that no agreement was likely on the proposal unless the amounts of the tax werelowered. Lowering the amounts, however, would tend to dilute the usefulness of the tax in funding development.
Discuss this in the Finance Markets forums
Story link: Europeans face down air tax for development funds suggestion
Add to Bookmarks:
Related financial stories to: Europeans face down air tax for development funds suggestion
- $1.5 trillion wiped off pensions funds
- Bank of England releases funds to calm markets
- Bank of England offers funds to lenders
- Merrill seeks funds from a foreign government
- Pensioners return to work due to lack of funds
- AMC and LCE to merge in face of declining cinema attendances
- Calpers to invest pensions in Asian Hedge Funds
- Bradford & Bingley maintains it has sufficient funds
- Hedge Funds take stakes in Northern Rock
- Holiday travelers face cash machine dilemma
Tags:
Previous: « Negative Empire State manufacturing index impacts bonds
Next: European investments threatened by possible French “No” to constituion »
Visited 375 times, 1 so far today