Larger, heavier vehicles could pay more for insurance
by Elaine Frei

In a review of its rating system for automobiles, the Association of British Insurers said Thursday that it will put more emphasis on the weight of vehicles for purposes of assigning insurance premiums. The ABI said that the new ratings will reflect new technologies and the wider range of vehicles being manufactured today. The number of vehicle groups will be increased from 20 to 50.
In making the weight of vehicles more of a factor in determining insurance premiums, the new ratings will take into consideration that the heavier a vehicle is, the more property damage and the greater injury to people in accidents. Under the new system, large 4X4s, called “Chelsea tractors” by some, will be placed in the category of heavier vehicles and could cost their owners more to insure.
The new ratings come in the wake of plans to make drivers of off-road vehicles such as 4X4s pay a higher London congestion charge and to charge them more for annual parking permits. An ABI spokesman said that drivers of the larger vehicles were not being singled out for higher insurance premiums, however. He noted that the group in which vehicles are placed in the ratings system is just one factor in determining the price of insurance premiums.
Discuss this in the Finance Markets forums
Story link: Larger, heavier vehicles could pay more for insurance
Add to Bookmarks:
Related financial stories to: Larger, heavier vehicles could pay more for insurance
- Seizure of uninsured vehicles doubles
- Women pay 9% less for their car insurance than men
- Driving with no insurance remains one of the UK’s biggest motoring problems
- Motorists using mobile phones could see rise in insurance premiums
- Reduce your car insurance
- Car Insurance Companies Aim to Lower Premiums
- Mobile phone use while driving can increase insurance premiums
- Comprehensive auto insurance said better deal than third party cover
- AA: Car insurance premiums likely to rise
- Advice on reducing car insurance premiums
Previous: « Government undecided on pensions case appeal
Next: More complaining about bank penalty charges »
Visited 540 times, 1 so far today