Consumer groups: intermediaries not needed to recover bank overcharges
by Elaine Frei

With complaints about penalty fees charged by banks and building societies for late payments soaring, many people have turned to companies that handle claims against businesses to help them get their money back. Consumer groups insist that these companies are not a necessary part of the claims process.
Some of the consumer groups offer sample letters and tips to help individuals who wish to go through the claims process on their own, noting that some of the firms charge up to 40 percent of the returned charge for their services. Additionally, the British Bankers Association has expressed skepticism about such firms, saying that the best thing for a customer with a claim to do is to contact the bank directly. Still, one such company has said it has been getting around 150 calls a week inquiring about their services.
Many of the intermediary companies promise that they will not charge a fee if no money is recovered but charge fee amounting to a percentage of the recovery if the claim is successful. These companies claim that they provide a needed service for individuals who are not comfortable acting for themselves. The managing director of one of these firms, Phoenix Financial Recovery, justifies the service it offers by noting that the recovery process involves writing a number of letters and filing documents in small claims court. He said that some people are not confident in handling the process successfully themselves.
A spokeswoman for Which?, a consumer group, counters that firms that offer these intermediary services have “no extra powers or persuasive abilities” to get the customer’s money back. She describes the process as one of just supplying details within template letters Which? has developed and then being patient while working through the recovery process.
Discuss this in the Finance Markets forums
Story link: Consumer groups: intermediaries not needed to recover bank overcharges
Add to Bookmarks:
Related financial stories to: Consumer groups: intermediaries not needed to recover bank overcharges
- District Judge rules in favor of bank in overcharges case
- Claims made that banks are misrepresenting overcharges judgement
- “No win, no fee” firms under investigation in relation to bank charge cases
- Intermediaries kept busy by remortgagers
- Wolseley leads building materials groups lower
- Courts, online claims service swamped by bank overdraft cases
- Budget wish-list from mortgage intermediaries
- Consumer advisors split on 125 percent mortgage
- New Banking Code means better consumer protection
- UK consumer confidence falls to record low
Previous: « Rics: Rental demand up but yields still low
Next: Unilever closes pension scheme »
Visited 1221 times, 2 so far today