Bank charges case enters third week
by Kay Murchie
The High Court test case into unfair bank charges is entering its third week. The eight banking institutions have argued that the ‘unauthorised’ overdrafts, to which the charges apply, are essential to personal banking.
The banking institutions involved are Abbey, Barclays, Clydesdale, HBOS, HSBC, Lloyds TSB, Nationwide Building Society and RBS. All banks declare that penalising customers up to £38 on overdrawn accounts is completely within their right.
In April 2006, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) ruled that the fees being charged by banks to their customers for items such as exceeding an overdraft limit or a bounced cheque (which in some cases were up to £40), were unfair and that although the banks were within their rights to charge, the amount should only be enough to cover administration costs.
The British Banking Association argued that the fees were justified so it was then down to the OFT to take the matter to court and obtain a firm ruling.
The OFT said that administration costs should cost no more than £30, as a consequence, thousands of customers have been claiming back the ‘unfair’ bank charges that they had paid.
The case commenced on January 17 and was originally meant to last around 8 days but it is looking likely that it will continue until mid February due to the degree of information that needs to be examined by the court.
Discuss this in the Finance Markets forums
Story link: Bank charges case enters third week
Add to Bookmarks:
Related financial stories to: Bank charges case enters third week
- Further delay in bank charges case
- Unfair bank charges ruling due this week
- Banks appeal against unfair charges case
- Decision is made on unfair bank charges
- District Judge rules in favor of bank in overcharges case
- No reclaimed bank charges until mid-2008
- Banks stalling on reclaimed bank charges
- Defaqto warns on bank account charges
- Lloyds TSB commences bank charges war
- Co-op blasted over bank charges
Previous: « Fortis faces sub-prime losses
Next: More repossessions go under the hammer »
Visited 3213 times, 1 so far today