|   FM Home  |   FM Forum  |   FM News  |   FM Blog  |  

Go Back   Finance & Money Forums > General > General Discussion
 

General Discussion General discussion board, for anything off-topic.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2008, 09:58 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 189
Default A sad day for the U.K.

Yesterday’s announcement by Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling to temporarily nationalize Northern Rock was a black day for the U.K. Government which is known for its economic competence.

This was the first such move by the Government to take such action in over 150 years. The argument behind the bad business decision was the decision by Darling that private bids for the bank were too low and not satisfactory.

Since when does any Government in a capitalistic society decide how much a publicly traded company is worth?

Virgin and Northern Rock’s management both put bids on the table for the bank but the government interfered and decided to take over which translates in more than 55 Billion Pound Sterling of liabilities for tax payers.

Who asked if tax payers even want those liabilities?

The government decided to act like a company. Fine, but they did not ask their ‘shareholders’ if they would agree with the ‘takeover’.

What would happen if a company would ignore its shareholders and proceeds with a takeover?

The government would react and shareholders would possibly file many lawsuits so why did the government break the rules and bypassed its ‘shareholders’?

The simple answer is that the ‘takeover’ would have been rejected and the bank would have accepted one of the two private offers on the table. The best solution to the Northern Rock situation would have been to let the bank’s shareholders decide which private offer to accept and let business be business.

No markets want or needs the interference of any government. The U.K., which is known to make good business decision, just took a big hit as far as confidence is concerned but one event should not completely derail trust. It is worth to mention that severe misstep comes only months after another bad decision on capital gains tax. This is two in a row which means one more and you’re out.

Darling ‘hopes’ that this is the best option to protect taxpayers and claims that every single pound will be repaid but what does Darling really say?

That he does not trust the private sector would be able to take care of Northern Rock better than the government which is a very sad development.

The best solution for every party involved would have been the bid by Richard Branson and his Virgin Group, both short-term as well as long-term.

We can all just hope that this was only one of a very few terrible decisions by the government and that steps like this will not be repeated. The markets have worked brilliantly without the attempt to interfere with them.

Please, for the sake of capitalism, let markets do what markets do, let businesses do what businesses do and the government should never interfere but rather focus on the issues they need to focus on.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2008, 04:49 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 19
Default Re: A sad day for the U.K.

i don't think it is such a big problem. It's only temporary and I would love Alistair Darling if he did this with my bank if it got into this situation, rather than lost all my money. Wouldn't anyone else?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 03:15 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 189
Default Re: A sad day for the U.K.

There were two private bids on the table and you would have not lost any of your money. This was a terrible step in the wrong direction. This will not be as temporary as many may think it will be. The government hopes that it will be but the verdict is out in the open about that.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2008, 11:57 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 19
Default Re: A sad day for the U.K.

Well apparently the bids weren't good enough in terms of what the public paid for it and what it would be sold at, so they chose to wait a few months before re-opening it up for sale. I don't see that as a bad thing.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2008, 11:27 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 189
Default Re: A sad day for the U.K.

That's because you miss the big picture. Every time any government interferes with business it is a bad sign.

Since when should any government determine what the value of a business is?

You think it is a good deal...but my guess is that you are not in business to start with. The public has just been loaded up with debt and probably will never get it back. You may think it will only be temporary but that is just a hope and may take longer than many hope for.

The bids were more than enough any by the way the public has nothing to do with this to start with. The investors are the primary concern here and they basically lost out. Deposits at the bank were never in danger with the bids on the table.

You may think this was a good move and that is your opinion but from a business perspective this was a terrible move and left a very bad impression.

Markets work best if you do not interfere, markets determined a fair price and with the governemnt stepping in it just send all the wrong signals.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-14-2008, 03:00 PM
BlueEew's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 17
Default Re: A sad day for the U.K.

Quote:
Originally Posted by EssentialParadox View Post
i don't think it is such a big problem. It's only temporary and I would love Alistair Darling if he did this with my bank if it got into this situation, rather than lost all my money. Wouldn't anyone else?
I agree it's not that much of a big deal. If it is temporary then the is no problem. However if this situation was to be permanant, then that would be a problem.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2008, 12:54 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 12
Default Re: A sad day for the U.K.

Economical and money conditions are changing all around the world so that is not strange or unexpected.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0

© 2005-2006 Finance Markets. All rights reserved  |  About  |  Disclaimer  |  Resources  |  XML Feed  |  Contact us